Honest Elections Oregon
  • Home
  • Legislature Update
  • Oregonian: Polluted by Money
  • Why Do This?
    • Need for Reform Overall
    • Need for Reform in Oregon
    • Slides
    • Frequently asked questions
  • Take Action
  • Email List
  • Editorials
    • Oregonian Editorial
  • Endorsers
    • Endorsers Now
    • Endorse
  • NEWS
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Calendar of Signature Gathering Events
  • Videos

HONEST ELECTIONS - OREGON

Why Do This? 

Picture
Picture
Oregon is almost unique in the United States.  There are only 5 other states which have no limitations on campaign contributions.

The State Integrity Investigation of the Center for Public Integrity in November 2015 graded Oregon an overall "F" in systems to avoid government corruption.  Oregon was ranked 49th worst out of 50 states in control of "Political Financing," beating only Mississippi on that score.

Big money, special interest money dominates Oregon politics at all levels of government in both candidate elections and ballot measures.   Some examples:

  • Legislators use pass-through contributions/donations to other legislators/candidates to hide true source of contributions.  Read more. 
  • Phil Knight contributes $380,000 to Republicans in competitive legislative races, by Hillary Borrud  Oct. 6, 2016, The Oregonian  Read more.    Update:  Phil Knight contributes $1 M to Republican Knute Buehler   Read more. 
  • Did campaign donations influence Commissioner Steve Novick’s vote on Terminal 1?  City Commissioner received $1,000 just 4 days before vote  Read more.
  • Just 600 big donors (including individuals, business entities, labor organizations, and PACs) accounted for nearly 60 percent of all money given to city campaigns in the last completed election cycle.  Read more    
  • Big Tobacco Makes Campaign Donations in Oregon   Read more
  • Oregon Gov. Kate Brown And AG Ellen Rosenblum Blaze The Oregon Trail Of Political Patronage  Read more  
In 2006, Oregon voters were asked to approve ballot measure 47.  M47 contained  limits on campaign contributions/expenditures and a lot more. Voters approved the measure but it has never been enforced because the Oregon Secretaries of State (there have been 4 since its approval) have refused. They claim that the Oregon Supreme Court has declared that all such limits are an unconstitutional infringement of free speech rights under the Oregon Constitution. 

In November 2016, Multnomah County voter approved a  set of limits on campaign contributions/expenditures by almost 90%.  Those limits are expected to generate a court challenge on their constitutionality.  Passage of this constitutional amendment would eliminate the reasoning for such a challenge, as the constitutionality of limits would now be part of the constitution.

In November 2018, Portland voters also approved a ballot measure almost identical to the Multnomah County measure. 
Learn about other efforts around the state to Get Big Money Out of Our Elections here.

Home

Why Do This?

News

Take Action

Contact

Donate
Copyright © 2015
  • Home
  • Legislature Update
  • Oregonian: Polluted by Money
  • Why Do This?
    • Need for Reform Overall
    • Need for Reform in Oregon
    • Slides
    • Frequently asked questions
  • Take Action
  • Email List
  • Editorials
    • Oregonian Editorial
  • Endorsers
    • Endorsers Now
    • Endorse
  • NEWS
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Calendar of Signature Gathering Events
  • Videos